The application deadline for the first set of scholarships is March 2002 winners will be notified by July 2002. Applications should be sent directly to the six nonprofit organizations that are participating in the program. They will also be notified of summer internship opportunities at Freedom Scientific and of career opportunities at the company upon graduation. Scholarship winners will receive vouchers for $2,500 or $1,500 to purchase any Freedom Scientific product, including hardware, software, accessories, training, and tutorials. The Freedom Scientific Technology Scholarship Award Program, which will begin with the 2001-02 school year, will be implemented through a partnership with the following nonprofit organizations that will screen applicants and select scholarship recipients: American Council of the Blind, AFB, Braille Institute of America, Canadian National Institute for the Blind, NFB, and Recording for the Blind and Dyslexic. For more information, visit AFB's web site: visit the FCC's web site: or read the article published in the May 23, 2001, edition of USA Today that discusses the challenges to the video description rule the article can be found at the web site: Assistive Technology Scholarshipįreedom Scientific, a producer of assistive technology products for people with sensory impairments and learning disabilities, launched a program to award $101,000 in annual technology scholarships to legally blind high school and college graduates in the United States and Canada who plan to pursue further education. ![]() AFB has also consistently advocated for a requirement for video description for television programming. The National Television Video Access Coalition, of which the American Foundation for the Blind (AFB) is a member, opposes the recent challenges to video description. The other petition, which was filed by the National Federation of the Blind (NFB), states that the new rules are arbitrary, capricious, and not in accordance with the law. Constitution in imposing a form of speech. One petition was filed by the Motion Picture Association of America, the National Association of Broadcasters, and the National Cable Television Association it states that the FCC does not have the authority to adopt a requirement for video description and that the requirement violates the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit. Two petitions challenging the video description rule-which requires an average of 50 hours of programming per quarter with narration of key visual elements for various television and cable markets, as well as emergency broadcast information, and was recently adopted by the Federal Communications Commission (FCC)- were filed in April 2001 in the U.S. Challenges to Video Description Regulations
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |